- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 12:02:10 +0100
- To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2015-02-02 11:55, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 2/02/2015 9:18 p.m., Julian Reschke wrote: >> On 2015-02-02 09:07, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>> Yes, but the semantics of those headers are exactly the same in both >>> directions. >> >> I think that's the case here, too. No? >> > > Unless I am completely mis-reading it. > > In both directions, and for all status codes it means "I can receive > encoding format(s) X,Y,Z". The rest of the draft is just elaboration and > specific syntax. Yes? Yes. If we had done this in RFC 7231, it would have been something like 5 additional lines. Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 2 February 2015 11:02:55 UTC