Re: draft-reschke-http-cice vs discussions in Toronto @ IETF 90: use as response header field

On 2/02/2015 9:18 p.m., Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2015-02-02 09:07, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Yes, but the semantics of those headers are exactly the same in both
>> directions.
> 
> I think that's the case here, too. No?
> 

Unless I am completely mis-reading it.

In both directions, and for all status codes it means "I can receive
encoding format(s) X,Y,Z". The rest of the draft is just elaboration and
specific syntax. Yes?

Amos

Received on Monday, 2 February 2015 10:55:40 UTC