W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: draft-reschke-http-cice vs discussions in Toronto @ IETF 90: use as response header field

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 09:18:13 +0100
Message-ID: <54CF32C5.8010402@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2015-02-02 09:07, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Yes, but the semantics of those headers are exactly the same in both directions.

I think that's the case here, too. No?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 2 February 2015 08:18:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:43 UTC