W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: New tunnel protocol

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:11:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUbDrgfToiZh8gqpcE1orwQPNSwY64E4q0HbLPLFt56jg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 21 January 2015 at 14:34, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com> wrote:
> So there's room for ambiguity around whether the next layer (after CONNECT)
> is TLS or not.  Or do we rely on the identifier also indicating it is over
> TLS, in which case what if there are 2 TLS layers?

I get your point.  My understanding, and what is written down, were
indeed quite different.

Does this help?

https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/7e2e57a48c21be2b68f856b41095800620fc1a20
http://httpwg.github.io/http-extensions/tunnel-protocol.html#rfc.section.1
(when Travis catches up)
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 23:11:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:42 UTC