- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:11:09 -0800
- To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 21 January 2015 at 14:34, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com> wrote: > So there's room for ambiguity around whether the next layer (after CONNECT) > is TLS or not. Or do we rely on the identifier also indicating it is over > TLS, in which case what if there are 2 TLS layers? I get your point. My understanding, and what is written down, were indeed quite different. Does this help? https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/7e2e57a48c21be2b68f856b41095800620fc1a20 http://httpwg.github.io/http-extensions/tunnel-protocol.html#rfc.section.1 (when Travis catches up)
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 23:11:36 UTC