Re: Martin Stiemerling's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10: (with COMMENT) from Mark Nottingham on 2015-01-21 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2015)

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:44:55 +1100
To: Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression.all@tools.ietf.org, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3177C51A-DC08-43DD-A15E-496F419471E0@mnot.net>

Hi Martin - 

> On 21 Jan 2015, at 9:37 pm, Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I just wonder if there is a second implementation, the shepherd report is pointing out one.

Follow the link - it's pointing to a list of 29 implementations (currently). HTTP/2 requires HPACK implementation.

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 22:45:31 UTC