- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 17:01:52 +1000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> On 2 Jun 2015, at 2:13 am, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 31 May 2015 at 18:06, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: >> This is an interesting discussion to have in concert with #69 regarding extensibility; if we make services containing unrecognised extensions must-ignore, it would make this sort of thing much chattier; the above as an after-the-fact extension would need to be this on the wire: >> >> Alt-Svc: h2=":443"; ma=3600, h2=":443"; ma=3600; persist > > Yep, but if we add it now, that concern is less of a problem because > servers can send it will a reasonable expectation of it being > understood. Absolutely. But, there's always the next extension… -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2015 07:02:20 UTC