- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 09:13:59 -0700
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 31 May 2015 at 18:06, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > This is an interesting discussion to have in concert with #69 regarding extensibility; if we make services containing unrecognised extensions must-ignore, it would make this sort of thing much chattier; the above as an after-the-fact extension would need to be this on the wire: > > Alt-Svc: h2=":443"; ma=3600, h2=":443"; ma=3600; persist Yep, but if we add it now, that concern is less of a problem because servers can send it will a reasonable expectation of it being understood.
Received on Monday, 1 June 2015 16:14:26 UTC