- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 11:06:52 +1000
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
<https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/71> Mike suggests that a hint in Alt-Svc as to whether it should be flushed on a network change could be helpful. Extrapolating, I think this could be a boolean flag, e.g., Alt-Svc: h2=":443"; ma=3600; persist (if we change the parameter ABNF to make arguments optional) Thoughts? This is an interesting discussion to have in concert with #69 regarding extensibility; if we make services containing unrecognised extensions must-ignore, it would make this sort of thing much chattier; the above as an after-the-fact extension would need to be this on the wire: Alt-Svc: h2=":443"; ma=3600, h2=":443"; ma=3600; persist Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 1 June 2015 01:07:19 UTC