- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:48:24 -0700
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>, "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
Discussion during last call of the tunnel-protocol draft identified the naming issue. Given time for reflection, are people comfortable renaming the header field to "ALPN"? I opened a pull request on this: https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/63
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 23:49:14 UTC