- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 16:16:04 -0700
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>, "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
Martin, it looks like we have consensus on doing that. Can you please spin another draft so we can have a brief look before going to IETF LC? Cheers, > On 15 Apr 2015, at 4:48 pm, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > > Discussion during last call of the tunnel-protocol draft identified > the naming issue. > > Given time for reflection, are people comfortable renaming the header > field to "ALPN"? > > I opened a pull request on this: > https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/63 > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Saturday, 18 April 2015 23:16:31 UTC