Re: The ALPN Header Field

Martin, it looks like we have consensus on doing that. Can you please spin another draft so we can have a brief look before going to IETF LC?


> On 15 Apr 2015, at 4:48 pm, Martin Thomson <> wrote:
> Discussion during last call of the tunnel-protocol draft identified
> the naming issue.
> Given time for reflection, are people comfortable renaming the header
> field to "ALPN"?
> I opened a pull request on this:

Mark Nottingham

Received on Saturday, 18 April 2015 23:16:31 UTC