Re: The ALPN Header Field

On 16/04/2015 11:48 a.m., Martin Thomson wrote:
> Discussion during last call of the tunnel-protocol draft identified
> the naming issue.
> 
> Given time for reflection, are people comfortable renaming the header
> field to "ALPN"?
> 
> I opened a pull request on this:
> https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/63
> 

Yes.

Amos

Received on Thursday, 16 April 2015 03:09:18 UTC