- From: Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management) <robby.simpson@ge.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:55:36 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 4/1/15, 12:15 AM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: >I’m neutral on alphabetical order; people can search for a specific >implementation in the table easily. I'm fine with alphabetical. Seems more "fair" - as I've seen inserting at top, bottom, etc. >What I’d like to do is switch the “draft support” column to “advertised >version(s)”, but that would mean everyone would need to fill out their >implementation status again — anyone mind? wfm
Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2015 17:56:05 UTC