- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 15:15:08 +1100
- To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
I’m neutral on alphabetical order; people can search for a specific implementation in the table easily. What I’d like to do is switch the “draft support” column to “advertised version(s)”, but that would mean everyone would need to fill out their implementation status again — anyone mind? Moving old implementations to a separate table makes sense; I’ve just done so for everything older than -12. > On 1 Apr 2015, at 2:59 pm, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > > On 1/04/2015 12:02 p.m., Greg Wilkins wrote: >> That wiki list is getting a bit long and hard to find particular servers as >> the order appears random (or is that in order implemented). >> Anybody mind if I put it into alphabetical order? > > Can we please drop the implementations that dont support latest > implementation+ draft(s) down to the bottom or an appendix table? > > Amos > > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2015 04:15:41 UTC