- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:22:54 +1100
- To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> On 23 Oct 2014, at 1:03 pm, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: > > I think a revised static table like I've proposed in https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/587 is perhaps a compromise that would not need the extra cycle, but achieve many of the benefits with little cost. > > In short, getting it right is more important for us than getting it out before Q2-2015. We don't think the status quo is right, but could live with either a #587 style fix in the short term or an option 3 fix in the mid term. Thanks, Greg. If other folks feel this way, I'd appreciate hearing it. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2014 04:23:20 UTC