- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 07:01:03 +0200
- To: Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com>
- Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
Hi Adrian, On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:22:21PM -0700, Adrian Cole wrote: > If we agree that api stuff does in fact use a lot of non-standard > headers, and we believe flipping back doesn't maim normal web, could > that be a strong enough case to revert? Please to be clear, noone suggests to flip back to what we previously had, there's no question about reintroducing the reference set whose removal has considerably simplified developers' experience. The idea is just to ensure that *at least* some dynamic headers can be encoded with a single byte so that all the future headers that are not part of the static set are not penalized so much as what Jeff observes. Regards, Willy
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2014 05:01:32 UTC