- From: Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:07:41 -0700
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
Yep. Thanks for being clearer than me. Willy. I didn't mean flipping back as reintroducing the reference set. I'm actually quite happy that's gone as a developer: it led to deleting some gnarly things. On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:22:21PM -0700, Adrian Cole wrote: >> If we agree that api stuff does in fact use a lot of non-standard >> headers, and we believe flipping back doesn't maim normal web, could >> that be a strong enough case to revert? > > Please to be clear, noone suggests to flip back to what we previously > had, there's no question about reintroducing the reference set whose > removal has considerably simplified developers' experience. The idea > is just to ensure that *at least* some dynamic headers can be encoded > with a single byte so that all the future headers that are not part of > the static set are not penalized so much as what Jeff observes. > > Regards, > Willy >
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2014 05:08:09 UTC