W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

HTTP/2 vs. proxies ?

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:52:53 +0000
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8000.1403369573@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CABkgnnX9+sf=1RmgyK498ZQwDX+tbAVinck4wpzUgTt4RyH4Cw@mail.gmail.com>
, Martin Thomson writes:

>We killed it so that we could avoid having to talk about it any more.
>That worked out well, didn't it?

I'm increasingly getting the feeling that we have people who like
the HTTP/2.0 draft and people who work with proxies, and that those
two sets are almost exclusive ?

I would be interesting to see what a straw-poll of these two
questions would show:

A)  I think HTTP/2.0 is ready for last call		YES/NO

B)  My primary HTTP/2.0 interest is proxy technology	YES/NO

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 21 June 2014 16:53:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC