W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: intermediaries, implicit gzip, etags, no-transform

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 23:14:17 +0200
Message-ID: <53A4A429.7030500@gmx.de>
To: Michael Piatek <piatek@google.com>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-06-20 22:53, Michael Piatek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> In the meantime, can you define what you consider a "real" site?
>
> A site that breaks when using the data compression proxy that is not
> contrived to do so.
>
>>>> - setting "cache-control: no-transform" on the response, does not change
>>>> this behavior, thus both seem to violate a "MUST NOT" requirement from
>>>> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7230.html#rfc.section.5.7.2>
>
> Actually, an example URL would be helpful for this case as well. In my
> testing, I observe the proxy respecting the no-transform directive;
> i.e., response payloads carrying cache-control: no-transform are not
> modified, nor are the protected headers.

Is "Content-Encoding" in your set of "protected headers"?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 20 June 2014 21:14:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC