W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: END_SEGMENT? (#397)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:21:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXv3FeOoJoH_r-Sf1ZUDkNpFyU3YAzm2w2mwVe18+bemA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yutaka Hirano <yhirano@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Sommermann <dcsommer@fb.com>, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>, "K.Morgan@iaea.org" <K.Morgan@iaea.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "C.Brunhuber@iaea.org" <C.Brunhuber@iaea.org>
On 18 June 2014 17:46, Yutaka Hirano <yhirano@google.com> wrote:
> I'm interested in WebSocket over HTTP/2 and it uses END_SEGMENT.
> The problem of specifying END_SEGMENT in WebSocket over HTTP/2 not in HTTP/2
> is, WebSocket over HTTP/2 can't be used with intermediaries that merely
> understand HTTP/2.

I'm less concerned about this particular problem, especially now that
we've effectively opened the door to extension.  Websockets is always
going to be dependent - at least a little - on the next hop
understanding something of the request.  We've talked in the past
about a new ALPN token for that, but it might be as simple now as

It would be relatively easy to port the necessary flags to a
websockets draft if we decided to remove them from HTTP/2.

I do think that we should be looking more seriously at your draft.  In
light of recent changes, but more because we agreed to do this, and I
think that you have the most fully developed proposal that we've
deferred due to increased attention on getting HTTP/2 done.
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2014 02:21:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC