- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 20:17:47 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- cc: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CABkgnnWs0Zcb-s1K_xxSM2nkji6YMEHvXz+qfcJL0fJj2wvF0g@mail.gmail.com> , Martin Thomson writes: >On 18 June 2014 13:06, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: >> Date is a hop-by-hop header, if it serves no use on a HTTP/2.0 to >> HTTP/2.0 hop, we can eliminate it, just like we eliminated the >> double CRNL after the headers, because it serves no use. > >It's not hop-by-hop by my reading: >https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-7.1.1.2 Hmm, you may be right. In that case we should transfer the time as a POSIX time_t in the HEADERS frame. Wasting time huffman encoding dates and still using 24 bytes where 8 would be plenty is just plain stupid. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2014 20:18:11 UTC