W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Stuck in a train -- reading HTTP/2 draft.

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:12:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWs0Zcb-s1K_xxSM2nkji6YMEHvXz+qfcJL0fJj2wvF0g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 18 June 2014 13:06, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> Date is a hop-by-hop header, if it serves no use on a HTTP/2.0 to
> HTTP/2.0 hop, we can eliminate it, just like we eliminated the
> double CRNL after the headers, because it serves no use.

It's not hop-by-hop by my reading:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-7.1.1.2

I'm not disagreeing with your premise, just the choice of the wagon
you are hitching this too.
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2014 20:12:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC