W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Other work items

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 23:07:07 +0200
Message-ID: <539B67FB.1060405@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-06-13 21:00, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> On 12 Jun 2014, at 4:55 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> There are also other things to think about for future HTTP work, such as, in no particular order:
>>
>> - how to handle RFC723? errata
>
> Thatís an administrative issue; we donít need to be in the same room to figure it out.
>
>
>> - addressing the C-E/Range Request issue
>
> That needs a draft and a serious amount of discussion on-list first; two hours in a room in Toronto are not going to move it significantly forward if we donít have those first.

I'm not sure how you decide when face-to-face makes sense or not :-)

> Is anyone writing a draft here?
>
>
>> - enhanced discover of C-E support
>
> Again, we need a draft. Is anyone writing?

I already did ;-)

>> - common header field syntax (JSON?)
>
> This is VERY speculative (although I have thought about it too). I-D?

Yes.

>> ...essentially all HTTP related topic that have come up in the past but was but aside due to other priorities.
>
> Indeed, these things are in-scope for our WG. However, we donít necessarily have to meet to make progress on them, especially when they havenít yet been discussed on-list.

Well, most of this has been discussed before.

I just wanted to point out that just because we currently don't have 
HTTP/2 issues to discuss doesn't mean a WG meeting wouldn't make sense.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 13 June 2014 21:07:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC