- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 10:50:49 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <41909C86-C128-4841-9E53-B1DF9B92B75C@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri tes: We're wandering out into the weeds here Mark, lets get back to my proposal: HTTP/2.0 is not enough of an improvement to warrant going on the standards track, and that it should be dropped for that reason, rather than make a lot of people waste a lot of time and expose the net to more new complex software with new bugs. If and when we are going to attempt again, we should start out trying to find out what problems should be addressed and which shouldn't, but that is an entirely different disussion, and I'll be happy to take that discussion at that time, with or without HTTP/2.0 in the picture. But right now, my argument is that HTTP/2.0 is not good enough that we should push it on the net at large. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 26 May 2014 10:51:14 UTC