- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 20:53:15 +1000
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 26 May 2014, at 8:50 pm, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > In message <41909C86-C128-4841-9E53-B1DF9B92B75C@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri > tes: > > We're wandering out into the weeds here Mark, lets get back to my > proposal: > > HTTP/2.0 is not enough of an improvement to warrant going on the > standards track, and that it should be dropped for that reason, > rather than make a lot of people waste a lot of time and expose the > net to more new complex software with new bugs. > > If and when we are going to attempt again, we should start out > trying to find out what problems should be addressed and which > shouldn't, but that is an entirely different disussion, and I'll > be happy to take that discussion at that time, with or without > HTTP/2.0 in the picture. > > But right now, my argument is that HTTP/2.0 is not good enough > that we should push it on the net at large. Noted. I suspect we’ll be discussing this more at our upcoming meeting, as well as on-list. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 26 May 2014 10:53:44 UTC