- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 22:06:07 -0700
- To: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>
- Cc: Erik Nygren <erik@nygren.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 1 May 2014 18:40, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote: > * I'd like to hear more people discussing it. The only participants on the > last thread that I saw were Martin, Mark, and Erik. Can others chime in? Yes, please. > * It's interesting to me that this appears to be mandatory for clients. I > need to think about this more deeply. Erik and Mark seem convinced. Me, less so, but I have to give these guys some credit for having to deal with issues that I don't think I've ever seen. > * Does sending an ALTSVC frame play nice with connection sharing? I haven't > thought about it too much. Actually, I think that this is a net win for servers in that regard. But that alone probably doesn't justify it. Servers get notified when clients decide to use alternative services. I think that the previous question is the determining one for me.
Received on Friday, 2 May 2014 05:06:38 UTC