- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:40:05 +0000
- To: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
- cc: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, William Chan <willchan@google.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CABaLYCsT4_e01eh7ghcXYDn8mAvgpxpKO=7PiPTh808C66ECow@mail.gmail.com>, Mike Belshe writes: >IPv6 suffered from slow deployment for reasons unrelated to security. a) >It offered little value. b) The main value it did offer was more easily >implemented through NAT c) it required OS-level upgrades to install. >HTTP/2 has none of these problems, [...] Or maybe you just don't want to see them ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sunday, 25 August 2013 20:40:29 UTC