W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: Nice

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:57:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbcOhhLrLp8H0qZ1-DBp85Y=vARYQRPPJRc3wc2hriP-vw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
My immediate first response is: how does this overlap with Stream
priority.. I know this is a separate thing but it would be good to
make it clear how these intersect.

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Martin Thomson
<martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On a different end of the spectrum that we're used to operating in for
> HTTP/2.0, this is a small proposal for a header that advises
> intermediaries about the relative (un)priority of requests.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-http-nice-00
>
> This is probably most useful for constrained servers (I've put core on BCC).
>
> --Martin
>
> p.s., The title isn't a value judgement, it's a nod to the unix
> utility (thanks to Richard Barnes for pointing this out).
>
Received on Friday, 16 August 2013 17:58:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:14 UTC