Re: Implicit close of idle streams

On 13/08/2013 21:37, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 13 August 2013 20:18, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>     The first use of a new stream identifier implicitly closes all idle
>> streams that might have been initiated by that peer with a
>> lower-valued stream identifier.
>>
>> This could use some clarification around what "idle stream" means. I
>> know we define it elsewhere but the context gets a bit lost here.
> Would it be clearer if it said "... implicitly closes all streams in
> the "idle" state ..." ?
Yes. I initially got confused by this text as well.

Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 21:23:24 UTC