Re: Implicit close of idle streams

On 13 August 2013 20:18, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>    The first use of a new stream identifier implicitly closes all idle
> streams that might have been initiated by that peer with a
> lower-valued stream identifier.
>
> This could use some clarification around what "idle stream" means. I
> know we define it elsewhere but the context gets a bit lost here.

Would it be clearer if it said "... implicitly closes all streams in
the "idle" state ..." ?

Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 20:38:02 UTC