- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 19:32:43 +0100
- To: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
- Cc: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 13 August 2013 18:58, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> wrote: > The upgrade case is the outlier and already has lots of special case logic. I suspected that this would be the reason :) > If the upgrade is successful than the session handling will have to manage a > stream-ID of 1. It doesn't make sense to couple the session handling with > the wire format. I'll note that the last sentence could be construed as an argument for starting from 3 always. I think that you instead want to say that you don't want to be affected by something you don't plan to implement.
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 18:33:10 UTC