sry, it return too early... The upgrade case is the outlier and already has lots of special case logic. If the upgrade is successful than the session handling will have to manage a stream-ID of 1. It doesn't make sense to couple the session handling with the wire format. On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> wrote: > yes > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> On 13 August 2013 11:08, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> >> wrote: >> > For simplicity and consistency I prefer that the stream #1 is always >> > reserved, so that client always starts with stream 3. >> >> This sounds like a reasonable motivation for option 3. Does anyone >> want to argue for using stream 1 when over TLS? >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 17:58:54 UTC