Re: initial stream id from a client from Jeff Pinner on 2013-08-13 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2013)

From: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:55:26 -0700
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CA+pLO_jyU+eyeExj5uVP2oaEvnT2Py13Z+A=B7--xC-PF4j7Vg@mail.gmail.com>

yes


On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Martin Thomson
<martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 13 August 2013 11:08, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
> wrote:
> > For simplicity and consistency I prefer that the stream #1 is always
> > reserved, so that client always starts with stream 3.
>
> This sounds like a reasonable motivation for option 3.  Does anyone
> want to argue for using stream 1 when over TLS?
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 17:55:53 UTC