RE: Who implemented which version of the compression draft?

MS OpenTech (Katana) implemented -01.



Fred, here’s the link to related emails on the list - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2013JulSep/0440.html and earlier  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2013JulSep/0256.html




Which suggests that it could be helpful to merge the compression draft into the http/2 draft? - https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/224




…Brian


Brian Raymor
Senior Program Manager
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation

From: Fred Akalin [mailto:akalin@google.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 11:00 AM

The spec text I mentioned is discussed in https://github.com/MSOpenTech/http2-katana/issues/19 .

On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Jain, Shakesh <shjain@akamai.com<mailto:shjain@akamai.com>> wrote:

Actually, that particular issue may just be a difference in wording.

I'm still curious, though, about who implemented what version.

At Akamai we implemented draft –00 (with at least one bug to fix in our implementation). I could not make it to interop so can you please share what part of the spec you are talking about?

Shakesh


On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Fred Akalin <akalin@google.com<mailto:akalin@google.com>> wrote:
Hey guys,

There are two versions of the compression draft: -00 and -01. httpbis-draft-04 refers to -00, but I vaguely remember an e-mail going out previously saying that we should work off -01. However, I forgot about that and worked off -00.

Out of curiosity, who implemented -00 and who implemented -01? I'm asking because there's at least one important difference (see https://github.com/MSOpenTech/http2-katana/issues/19 ) and I'd like to know which one to refer to to get the widest interoperability.

-- Fred