- From: Fred Akalin <akalin@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 19:59:37 +0200
- To: "Jain, Shakesh" <shjain@akamai.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2013 18:00:04 UTC
The spec text I mentioned is discussed in https://github.com/MSOpenTech/http2-katana/issues/19 . On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Jain, Shakesh <shjain@akamai.com> wrote: > > Actually, that particular issue may just be a difference in wording. > > I'm still curious, though, about who implemented what version. > > > At Akamai we implemented draft –00 (with at least one bug to fix in our > implementation). I could not make it to interop so can you please share > what part of the spec you are talking about? > > Shakesh > > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Fred Akalin <akalin@google.com> wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> >> There are two versions of the compression draft: -00 and -01. >> httpbis-draft-04 refers to -00, but I vaguely remember an e-mail going out >> previously saying that we should work off -01. However, I forgot about that >> and worked off -00. >> >> Out of curiosity, who implemented -00 and who implemented -01? I'm asking >> because there's at least one important difference (see >> https://github.com/MSOpenTech/http2-katana/issues/19 ) and I'd like to >> know which one to refer to to get the widest interoperability. >> >> -- Fred >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2013 18:00:04 UTC