- From: RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:09:03 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Yes, the eviction algorithm needed some clarification. I went for the proposal which had the most support on the mailing list. Hervé. > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com] > Sent: mercredi 10 juillet 2013 22:37 > To: HTTP Working Group > Subject: Compression update > > The header compression draft has been revised and aside from some > clarifications, it includes a changed eviction algorithm. > > Are the working group comfortable - particularly those who are > implementing this for the Hamburg interim - with the revised algorithm? > > Also, I'd like opinions on whether -05 should be issued to refer to this draft, > or whether we can get by with -04. I really want to avoid any confusion over > what string we are negotiating if it comes to ALPN, NPN or Upgrade > negotiation. Currently, that string is "HTTP-draft-04/2.0", updating to -05 > would likely require that people negotiate "HTTP-draft-05/2.0".
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2013 16:09:34 UTC