- From: Jain, Shakesh <shjain@akamai.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 12:54:55 -0500
- To: Fred Akalin <akalin@google.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2013 17:55:25 UTC
Actually, that particular issue may just be a difference in wording. I'm still curious, though, about who implemented what version. At Akamai we implemented draft –00 (with at least one bug to fix in our implementation). I could not make it to interop so can you please share what part of the spec you are talking about? Shakesh On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Fred Akalin <akalin@google.com<mailto:akalin@google.com>> wrote: Hey guys, There are two versions of the compression draft: -00 and -01. httpbis-draft-04 refers to -00, but I vaguely remember an e-mail going out previously saying that we should work off -01. However, I forgot about that and worked off -00. Out of curiosity, who implemented -00 and who implemented -01? I'm asking because there's at least one important difference (see https://github.com/MSOpenTech/http2-katana/issues/19 ) and I'd like to know which one to refer to to get the widest interoperability. -- Fred
Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2013 17:55:25 UTC