- From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 09:31:20 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Julian, > The problem that I have with this "MAY" is that it states something > obvious; we have a flow control feature, and a party in the data flow > can invoke it. Why is there a "MAY" here? I had assumed that it wasn't obvious to everyone. This particular MAY seems more intended toward the sender rather than the receiver. But just as I said don't contort to avoid language, liberal sprinklings of MAY area also unnecessary. Eliot
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2013 07:31:50 UTC