Re: NEW ISSUE: Define "ought to"

On 31/07/2013 9:44 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> On 7/31/13 10:58 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> This is a *fascinating* thread, but until there's some general IETF consensus on such matters, I'm inclined to leave the decision about specific language in the hands of the editors; they've done well so far.
>>
> There is an IETF consensus on such matters.  It is RFC 2119.

     If I understand you correctly, you agree with Yoav that:

> It's the same with standards. We expect them to tell us what to do. So for the reader, all of the following are equivalent:

     If so, I agree with both of you.

Gili

Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2013 14:47:53 UTC