- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 20:41:11 +0000
- To: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
- cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Sam Pullara <spullara@gmail.com>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <29B4ED34-8A7F-477F-AC80-47BC2205198F@checkpoint.com>, Yoav Nir writ es: >It's more than procedural. Whatever is wrong with the use of cookies to >manage sessions is wrong in HTTP/1.x just as much as it is in /2.0. Yes, that's why we should solve the problem in HTTP/2.0 and make the protocol so good that people will desire to migrate because it is simply better. >Your proposal (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2013JulSep/0284.html) includes prohibiting cookies on HTTP/2.0. This directly conflicts > with this working group's goal [...] You say that like those goals were god-given and imutable. Maybe the reason why the current draft is so mediocre is that the goal that was aimed at was just not the right one ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 13 July 2013 20:41:34 UTC