- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 15:46:45 -0700
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, William Chan (ιζΊζ) <willchan@chromium.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 3 May 2013 14:22, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > This does differ from SPDY, This doesn't differ from the SPDY we were given. > but (still) seems reasonable given the number of > streams created in the initial RTT shouldn't be unbounded anyway. > Assuming we have persisted settings (which is in doubt, I guess), this would > only be a problem for the first RTT in a session where we didn't have the > persisted setting. I think that this default is under contention still: https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/40 We may ultimately determine that some value between 0 (what #40 proposes) and infinity (status quo) is more appropriate.
Received on Friday, 3 May 2013 22:47:12 UTC