- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 23:01:15 +0000
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
In message <20120713225104.GK16256@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes: >Whatever will be retained as a basis for HTTP/2.0, this exercise is >useful and may incite other users to provide very valuable feedback. I think it is premature, because it obscures and prevents the much needed high-level design of HTTP/2.0. And that is exactly why I think the current approach and timeline is a road to nowhere fast. The fact that we just saw Google say they would get behind any improvement, as long as it is SPDY pretty much dooms the HTTP/2.0 effort right there and then: All that's on the table is minor rearrangements of the deckchairs, there is no opening for changing the course. And with that, over and out. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 13 July 2012 23:01:37 UTC