Re: SPDY Header Frames

In message <>, Willy Tarreau writes:

>Whatever will be retained as a basis for HTTP/2.0, this exercise is
>useful and may incite other users to provide very valuable feedback.

I think it is premature, because it obscures and prevents the much
needed high-level design of HTTP/2.0.

And that is exactly why I think the current approach and timeline
is a road to nowhere fast.

The fact that we just saw Google say they would get behind any
improvement, as long as it is SPDY pretty much dooms the HTTP/2.0
effort right there and then:  All that's on the table is minor
rearrangements of the deckchairs, there is no opening for
changing the course.

And with that, over and out.

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Received on Friday, 13 July 2012 23:01:37 UTC