- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 22:55:01 +0000
- To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- cc: "HAYASHI, Tatsuya" <lef.mutualauth@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Brian Pane <brianp@brianp.net>
In message <5000A5DA.8090006@cs.tcd.ie>, Stephen Farrell writes: >So that's just not easily solved. Absolutely not. But I don't the pretending that it isn't an issue works out too well either, as evidenced by the current cleanup of unwisely issued certificates. >Though I guess not for the "corporate censor" >part. I dunno what can be done about that. Allowing you to send "GET https://...." to a proxy will go a long way for quite a lot of these cases. >Anyway, interesting challenges ahead all right! Indeed, but only if the WG decides to actually do something about them. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 13 July 2012 22:55:24 UTC