Re: SPDY Header Frames

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>wrote:

> In message <20120713225104.GK16256@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes:
>
> >Whatever will be retained as a basis for HTTP/2.0, this exercise is
> >useful and may incite other users to provide very valuable feedback.
>
> I think it is premature, because it obscures and prevents the much
> needed high-level design of HTTP/2.0.
>
> And that is exactly why I think the current approach and timeline
> is a road to nowhere fast.
>







>
> The fact that we just saw Google say they would get behind any
> improvement, as long as it is SPDY pretty much dooms the HTTP/2.0
>


For the record, Google did not say that.

Such negative biases really don't help the discussion.

Mike





> effort right there and then:  All that's on the table is minor
> rearrangements of the deckchairs, there is no opening for
> changing the course.
>
> And with that, over and out.
>
>


> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
>
>