- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:26:06 +0000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <4F34FD9C.4030408@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes: >On 2012-02-10 12:14, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In particular there was no mention of formalizing the semantics/transport >> split that gave me an indication that this was to even be a, and >> certainly not *the*, major goal. >> ... > >Actually, it is already a goal for HTTPbis; Parts 2..7 should be >independent of transport. Yes, and that is a good and nice first step. But we need to define the transport primitives to make that a usable reality. >I would be surprised if they care about technical details like that :-) You would be surprised if you had any idea how starved they are for anything at all to publish a story on with a big headline. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 10 February 2012 11:26:29 UTC