- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:21:00 +0100
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2012-02-10 12:14, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message<8467DC8F-2F8A-4F71-8C70-547716EB9088@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri > tes: > >> This is a detailed work plan, not a way to find agreement on an approach >> (which is what many people -- including you -- have said they want). > > It absolutely is, but I find that it is a much better idea to write > abstract based on concrete, than the other way around. > > The reason why I responded with my list is that I did not read your > proposed charter as supporting getting from the A we have to the B > we, or at least I, want. > > In particular there was no mention of formalizing the semantics/transport > split that gave me an indication that this was to even be a, and > certainly not *the*, major goal. > ... Actually, it is already a goal for HTTPbis; Parts 2..7 should be independent of transport. > To me, your charter sounds like the httpbis WG will graft a single new > transport protocol onto HTTP/1.1bis and call it HTTP/2.0. > > If I can read it that way, I leve to your imagination what headline > ComputerWorld will put on it. I would be surprised if they care about technical details like that :-)
Received on Friday, 10 February 2012 11:21:32 UTC