Re: Performance implications of Bundling and Minification on HTTP/1.1 from Roberto Peon on 2012-06-26 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2012)

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:28:57 -0700
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Howard Dierking <howard@microsoft.com>, William Chan <willchan@chromium.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNfZobJF7h8Tsg+kETJ89D3MRbuCX7F=rciCWzE8WCDL+w@mail.gmail.com>

I hope we're all in agreement on that :)

-=R
On Jun 25, 2012 11:13 PM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

>
> On 26/06/2012, at 3:49 PM, William Chan (陈智昌) wrote:
>
> > I agree that application level improvements have a bigger impact than
> protocol level improvements. But I think that it'd be great for the
> protocol to eliminate deficiencies for which application developers have to
> work around (e.g. domain sharding). There are so many web performance
> guidelines that developers need to keep in mind...the less that they have
> to do to work around protocol deficiencies, the better.
>
> Agreed on all points. The situation that we should avoid, I think, are
> protocol-level gains that *require* lots of tweaking / expertise on the
> server side. It's fine to accommodate them, of course, as long as they
> don't hurt the common case.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 06:36:03 UTC