W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Performance implications of Bundling and Minification on HTTP/1.1

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 06:44:59 +0000
To: "Martin Nilsson" <nilsson@opera.com>
cc: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8564.1340520299@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <op.wgdnclbjiw9drz@manganese.bredbandsbolaget.se>, "Martin Nilsson" 

> or is "use HTTP/1.1 instead" an  acceptable fallback?

I think it would be an acceptable fallback, but I don't think it
would be a wise fallback.

First of all, it's not like we can prevent people from doing those
actions on HTTP/2.0 anyway, so whatever our feelings might be, people
will do what they have/want to do anyway.

Second, it would prevent us from ever getting rid of HTTP/1.x

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sunday, 24 June 2012 06:45:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:00 UTC