- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 06:44:59 +0000
- To: "Martin Nilsson" <nilsson@opera.com>
- cc: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <op.wgdnclbjiw9drz@manganese.bredbandsbolaget.se>, "Martin Nilsson" writes: > or is "use HTTP/1.1 instead" an acceptable fallback? I think it would be an acceptable fallback, but I don't think it would be a wise fallback. First of all, it's not like we can prevent people from doing those actions on HTTP/2.0 anyway, so whatever our feelings might be, people will do what they have/want to do anyway. Second, it would prevent us from ever getting rid of HTTP/1.x -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sunday, 24 June 2012 06:45:24 UTC