- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:36:42 -0700
- To: Albert Lunde <atlunde@panix.com>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 15 June 2012 00:37:11 UTC
You folks who want an enriched semantic payload describing the finer-grained aspects of different modes & causes of policy-driven blockage need to come up with some detailed proposals, maybe a controlled vocabulary too. Also, it’s clear that this is entirely separate issue from the original proposal, for a single HTTP status code saying “legal restrictions” with a SHOULD saying “please explain in the response body”. Neither need depend on the other. -T On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Albert Lunde <atlunde@panix.com> wrote: > Rather than having details of the policy/legal etc. restrictions in > additional headers, would there be any merit in having a structured XML > mime multi-part, containing information in a parseable form? > > I suppose if one put text or HTML body parts first, a simple-minded client > would display that, but an advanced client could get more details. > > > > >
Received on Friday, 15 June 2012 00:37:11 UTC