- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:28:04 +1200
- To: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 12.06.2012 12:21, James M Snell wrote: > My apologies... accidentally responded directly to Mark instead of > the > group... Another possible approach to early implementation is to > designate a range of experimental, non-production status codes for > early development purposes that MUST NOT be used in production... > once > the draft progresses to a reasonable stage (well beyond -01, the real > status can be assigned to the spec by the registrar rather than by > the > spec author. I know schemes like this can tend to be problematic > (e.g. > all those damn X- HTTP headers) so I'm not sure if it's a path we > should go down, but it's an idea at least. > You mean 490-499 for a 4XX exeprimental status? Or completely out of the way range like 700-799? with requirement that once RFCs exist the experiments be dropped. Amos
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2012 00:28:30 UTC