None. But when some ISP or search engine gets a court order saying “You are
forbidden to link to {The Pirate Bay|Anonymous|whatever}, they have a
strong incentive to be transparent about it. Now in some countries, the
censors will also pass a law saying it’s forbidden to disclose the
censorship; but thankfully, not all. -T
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Musatov, Martin - CW <
Martin.Musatov@bestbuy.com> wrote:
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 11:03 AM
> To: James M Snell
> Cc: Tim Bray; Mark Nottingham; Karl Dubost; ietf-http-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Status code for censorship?
>
> On 2012-06-11 17:54, James M Snell wrote:
> > I can definitely live with that.. anything that increases the
> > visibility of censorship is not a bad thing.
>
> Yes, but what incentives are there for censors to comply with its use?
> Martin
>
> Looks like status code
> > 427 is open currently.
> > ...
>
> So is 418. In any case, if we go there it should be 451.
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
> PS: and I do agree with Mark that it's unlikely that it'll be tricky to
> get something standardized that might give the impression that censorship
> is ok.
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 11 June 2012 16:13:02 UTC